Monday 5 October 2026 About  ·  Contact
YOUR COMMUNITY · YOUR STORIES Somerset Daily
School Photography

Somerset photographer urges parents not to use AI to remove school photo watermarks

The start of the school term often brings fresh uniforms, shiny shoes and the traditional school photograph, a keepsake many families cherish. Professional school photos, however, come with a cost that some parents find hard to justify amid other school expenses. Increasingly, some have used artificial intelligence tools to remove watermarks from proof images instead of purchasing the photographs.

Victoria Welton, a Somerset mother and professional photographer, has voiced her concerns over this growing trend. She emphasises that this practice not only impacts her income but also raises serious issues regarding the privacy of the children involved.

Victoria explains, “Photographers do not charge schools for the photography service. Instead, we invest in equipment, spend hours photographing and editing hundreds of children, manage secure online galleries, and handle all administration in the expectation that parents will buy the photos. Sales from these photographs support my small business.”

READ MORE: 70-year-old appears in court over Worle explosives case

READ MORE: 42 minutes, 2 seconds to spare, 1 marriage intact: My descent into Glastonbury ticket hell

She cautions parents about the consequences of using AI to remove watermarks, stating that it infringes copyright and undermines her ability to continue providing this service. More importantly, she highlights the risks of uploading children’s images to AI platforms without understanding how these services process and use the data. “A school photograph often shows a child in uniform, sometimes with identifying information. Parents should consider privacy and safety carefully before uploading these images to AI tools. Purchasing through official channels ensures security and supports the photographer’s work.”

Victoria’s message has resonated with many, sparking hundreds of shares and discussions among parents. While some understand her viewpoint, others express concerns about the affordability of school photographs amid financial struggles. Comments from parents include calls for lower prices, suggestions for opt-in models for photo purchases, and frustrations over what is perceived as high costs for single digital images.

Nonetheless, there is strong support for protecting photographers’ rights and children’s privacy online. One commentator warned that uploading children’s faces to AI could teach the tools to replicate these images, potentially allowing misuse. Another pointed out the increasing ubiquity of facial recognition technology and the need for caution in sharing photos digitally.

As this debate continues, the key message from Victoria Welton remains clear: school photographs are the product of skilled professionals working hard to provide a valued service, and safeguarding children’s privacy should always be paramount. Parents are encouraged to weigh these factors carefully when deciding how to handle their children’s school photographs.