A Somerset MP is pressing the government to provide fair compensation to businesses losing revenue due to prolonged roadworks near Junction 26 of the M5 and the Chelston Link Road, currently closed for a £5.7 million upgrade. Traffic destined for Wellington has been diverted via the A38, causing significant access challenges for local enterprises, with the disruption expected to last until the end of September.
Gideon Amos, the MP for Taunton and Wellington, has campaigned for months to secure support for small businesses and charities adversely affected by major infrastructure projects. Although his attempt to introduce a compensation clause into the Planning and Infrastructure Bill was unsuccessful in the House of Commons, the issue remains under consideration as the Bill advances to the House of Lords.
During a Westminster Hall debate on June 18, just days after the Wellington roadworks commenced, Mr. Amos emphasized the vital role rural businesses play in the community. He highlighted companies like Apple Campers, Western Recovery Services, and TLC Garage Services, which rely heavily on motorway access to operate effectively, often holding emergency contracts requiring rapid motorway response.
READ MORE: Faces of Glastonbury: Capturing the Spirit as Crowds Arrive
READ MORE: Steps' Ian ‘H’ Watkins Reflects on Missed Glastonbury Moment and Personal Struggles
Under current legislation, compensation is only available for property damage or loss of land value, excluding losses caused by disruption to trade or access. Mr. Amos' proposed ‘clause 21’ aimed to extend support to businesses and charities experiencing significant financial detriment or access issues due to roadworks. He cited estimates from affected firms anticipating losses as high as £14,000 over the closure period.
Despite these concerns, Housing and Planning Minister Matthew Pennycook argued that businesses inherently accept the risks associated with temporary disruptions and that any compensation could potentially hinder infrastructure development. He noted that affected parties can raise issues during planning or temporary traffic order consultations.
Though the committee voted against the compensation clause, the debate underscores a broader call for balancing public infrastructure benefits with the economic challenges faced by local businesses. As the Planning and Infrastructure Bill proceeds, the futures of these rural companies remain closely tied to government decisions on support measures during disruptive projects.