A century-old oak tree in a Somerset housing estate has been spared from removal after Somerset Council denied a homeowner’s request to chop it down. The oak, located in the backyard of 5 Collett Way, Frome, stands near a large upcoming residential development and has been protected by a tree preservation order since 1989.
Jessica Ohren, the homeowner, sought permission to remove the tree, citing subsidence issues impacting her garage and conservatory. She argued that extensive root intrusion had caused significant structural damage, including sloping floors and cracking walls. Her representatives presented evidence suggesting that roots had penetrated the foundations, making the tree a key contributor to ongoing property deterioration.
Despite these claims, the council rejected the removal application, emphasizing the tree’s exceptional amenity value and raising concerns that felling it could exacerbate property damage. Planning officers highlighted the tree’s status as an ancient oak with significant biodiversity importance, noting such trees support diverse habitats unique in Europe.
READ MORE: Dog Walker’s Quick Reaction Saves Her from Falling Tree Branch in Bath
READ MORE: Yeovil Town Secure Experienced Midfielder Zain Westbrooke on Three-Year Deal
Local voices support preserving the oak. Resident Sally Nilsson criticized the home’s proximity to the tree as the root cause of damage, advocating for underpinning the house rather than removing the tree. Frome Town Council also opposed the felling, describing the oak as a vital feature predating the housing development and integral to the area’s character. They questioned the robustness of the subsidence claims and urged consideration of alternative solutions.
Planning officer Nick Ball explained the council’s decision reflects sound arboricultural practice and regulatory compliance gaps in the building. He warned that removing the oak could trigger ‘ground heave’—a swelling of soil caused by increased moisture absorption after tree removal—potentially causing further structural harm. As an oak, the tree has historically contributed to soil moisture deficits that maintained ground stability.
While Ms. Ohren has not yet revealed if she will appeal the council’s decision, the case highlights the complex challenge of balancing heritage tree conservation with property rights and maintenance concerns.