Plans to merge the Somerset town of Langport with its neighboring parish, Huish Episcopi, have been postponed following a legal challenge. Langport, largely encircled by Huish Episcopi, has faced financial pressures, with its town council raising council taxes to fund services for residents primarily living in the adjoining parish. Despite Langport’s stable population, this imbalance has prompted Somerset Council to propose merging the two parishes ahead of May 2027’s local elections.
In September 2025, the council’s constitution and governance committee voted in favor of the merger, but advancing this plan has now been delayed after legal objections were raised. On May 20, the full council agreed to further review the issue before making any final decisions.
Council leader Bill Revans explained at the Bridgwater meeting: “We have received a legal challenge and sought advice, which arrived quite late. Members need additional time to examine these matters thoroughly before voting.” He suggested that a dedicated briefing may be necessary to clarify the complex legal issues involved.
READ MORE: Government Forces Bath and North East Somerset to Double Housing Targets and Weaken Green Planning Rules
READ MORE: Bath’s Mistakes Costly but Johann van Graan Backs Bold Late Penalty Decision
Alyn Jones, the council’s monitoring officer responsible for custodian oversight of democratic processes, disclosed receiving a letter on May 14 from lawyers representing the Huish Episcopi Residents Association. The letter alleges that the consultation and decision process was unlawful and failed to comply with the council’s constitution. It urged the council to halt the merger and warned of potential court action should the council proceed.
After reviewing the concerns and consulting with the case officers, Jones recommended the council pause the decision. He advised referring the proposal back to the constitution and governance committee for further legal guidance.
Councillor Ross Henley, chair of that committee, emphasized the extensive examination already undertaken by the council and urged members not to revisit the original rationale but to focus on obtaining proper legal advice. Councillor Sue Osborne, also on the committee, expressed confidence in the thoroughness and professionalism of the process, refuting claims that the earlier deliberations were irrational.
The council has not announced a timeline for when the merger proposal will return to the governance committee for reconsideration.