Acclaimed film director Ken Loach has joined local residents in protesting against Bath Rugby’s controversial proposal to construct a permanent 18,000-seat stadium on the Recreation Ground, a cherished green space in the heart of Bath.
The Bath and North East Somerset Council is set to review the planning application on September 17. However, the government has intervened, instructing the council not to approve the plan without explicit authorization from the Secretary of State, highlighting the significance of the decision.
On September 5, around 30 Bath residents, including Loach, gathered on Johnston Street, a Georgian terrace adjacent to the Recreation Ground, to voice their opposition. Loach described the proposed stadium as “a travesty” and “a desecration” of the city’s renowned architecture, explaining that Bath’s unique appeal lies in its historic buildings like the Roman Baths and medieval abbey—not in imposing modern sports structures.
READ MORE: Mum Warns Beach-Goers After Toddler Suffers Burns from Hidden Fire Pit
READ MORE: Bath’s Emberwood and 15 Other Restaurants Join the Prestigious Michelin Guide
Loach emphasized the importance of preserving the Recreation Ground as an open green space for all, supporting everything from casual football games to picnics and leisurely walks with views of Bath Abbey and the surrounding hills. He stressed that the land was gifted to the people of Bath in 1956 for community leisure and should remain accessible to all sports and visitors, not dominated by a wealthy rugby club’s ambitions.
While over 5,000 people have expressed support for the stadium, there is strong opposition, with 368 formal objections lodged against the application. Neighbours like Rosemary Carne, who lives near the site, worry about the loss of sunlight and green views, as the stadium would be closer and taller than the current setup. Environmental activists, such as Mel Clarke and Jay Risbridger, also raised concerns about the potential ecological impact, especially related to the use of artificial turf and its effects on nearby wildlife habitats like the River Avon.
Supporters of Bath Rugby, including local fans, argue that the stadium is integral to the city’s sporting culture and economy. Bath Rugby stated that the project would deliver a world-class venue that boosts tourism, revitalizes the riverside, and encourages wider community sports participation, all while coexisting respectfully with the city’s heritage and neighbours.
The council planning officers, after extensive review, found the proposal generally aligns with development policies but deferred final judgment due to the government’s directive. The upcoming planning committee meeting will further deliberate on the matter, with councillors also invited to advise the Secretary of State on the application.
Green councillor Joanna Wright has called for postponing the planning decision until after an upcoming local by-election, citing the significant impact on local residents and the need for transparent public scrutiny. Meanwhile, council leader Kevin Guy affirmed that planning decisions should be based on law rather than political timing.
Legal challenges surrounded the Recreation Ground’s future, with historic covenants designed to protect it as a multi-use green space. However, recent court rulings have removed legal barriers, leaving planning permission as the decisive factor.
The Bath stadium debate encapsulates the tension between preserving the city’s historic landscape and supporting modern development. The council’s decision next week promises to be a pivotal moment for Bath’s community and heritage.