A disabled man from Taunton is set to challenge Somerset Council in the High Court over changes to its council tax reduction scheme, which he claims are discriminatory and irrational.
The council amended its scheme in February 2025 to unify the level of support across Somerset and address financial constraints. However, research by Citizens Advice Somerset found that over 4,000 people on universal credit, specifically those receiving the limited capability for work-related activity (LCWRA) element, are now facing higher council tax bills. These increases stem from the council’s changes combined with central government reforms.
Andy Mitchell, a Taunton resident who is disabled and unable to work due to multiple physical and mental health conditions, has been granted permission to bring a judicial review against the council. Represented by Bristol law firm Leigh Day, Mr. Mitchell argues that the current scheme unlawfully penalises disabled people and others with additional needs.
Previously, under the council’s older reduction scheme, Mr. Mitchell did not have to pay council tax due to his disability. After being transitioned from legacy benefits to universal credit, his council tax relief was drastically cut. He now pays 90% of his council tax bill, amounting to over £1,100 annually, with only a £2 weekly reduction.
Mr. Mitchell expressed his frustration: “When moved onto universal credit, I was assured my income would be protected and I would not be worse off. Receiving a hefty council tax bill despite no change in my health or circumstances was a shock. It’s unacceptable that the DWP reassures claimants their income is safeguarded while council tax increases erode their finances. This has caused me real anxiety and distress.”
The judicial review, permitted by the High Court in January 2026, contends the council’s scheme contains structural flaws that discriminate against disabled people and other protected groups, violating equality rules. The case could have wider implications for many others affected by universal credit migration.
Carolin Ott, solicitor representing Mr. Mitchell, said the scheme’s treatment of disabled residents raises serious legal concerns. “Our client’s needs remain unchanged, yet his council tax liability has soared simply because of benefit migration. The court’s permission to proceed reflects the strength of his claim, and the hearing will thoroughly test the scheme’s lawfulness.”
Linda Burnip, co-founder of Disabled People Against Cuts, voiced continued alarm over disabled individuals facing increased financial burdens after moving to universal credit, which pushes many deeper into poverty.
Somerset Council stated it will contest the judicial review and conduct a comprehensive review of its reduction scheme over the coming year. A spokesperson emphasized ongoing support efforts, including a means-tested hardship scheme, and promised public consultation in summer 2026 ahead of implementing any changes in April 2027.
Residents concerned about council tax support are encouraged to contact the council for information about available assistance programs.