The British judicial system is grappling with an unprecedented backlog of nearly 77,000 cases in Crown Courts, with some hearings delayed until 2029. This growing crisis has sparked calls for sweeping reforms aimed at delivering justice more swiftly.
Sir Brian Leveson, a highly respected former judge, has proposed a bold plan to eliminate jury trials for certain serious offences. His report warns that the current system is “too broken” to be fixed by increased funding or extended court sittings alone, urging immediate and radical change to avoid systemic collapse.
Leveson recommends that over 150 serious crimes—such as sexual grooming, child abduction, and causing death by careless driving—be transferred to a newly established court division. This division would decide cases through a panel consisting of a judge and two magistrates, without a jury. Other offences, including possession of some Class B and C drugs and vehicle theft, would be handled by magistrates’ courts with possible sentence reductions of up to 40% to incentivize guilty pleas and reduce trial lengths.
READ MORE: Wiltshire MP Criticizes Government’s Industrial Strategy for Overlooking Rural Economy
READ MORE: Mega Somerset Solar Farm Set to Power 18,000 Homes Moves Closer to Approval
The report cites factors intensifying the backlog, including the Covid-19 pandemic, barristers’ strikes, and the rising complexity of cases requiring analysis of mobile phone data and DNA evidence. Complex cases like fraud and money laundering could be resolved by judges alone, sparing juries from intricate legal and technical details.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood is currently reviewing these recommendations carefully, considering which offences might be suitable for trial without juries. She has emphasized the need for “bold reform” to tackle the backlog and provide faster justice for victims.
The backlog itself is historic. At the end of March 2024, there were 76,957 outstanding cases, up from 69,021 the previous year, and more than double the 38,056 cases recorded just before the pandemic in December 2019. Although efforts had reduced backlog numbers between 2015 and 2018, the pandemic reversed this progress dramatically.
The proposed reforms aim to stem the tide of delayed justice and adapt the legal process to modern challenges. The debate raises important questions about balancing speedy trials with fundamental rights like jury trial participation.
Public opinion is invited: Is sacrificing jury trials justified if it means justice is served more promptly? What challenges or concerns do you foresee with this proposal? Share your thoughts and join the conversation below.