A controversial decision by the Bath and North East Somerset Council to potentially end free parking in Midsomer Norton and Radstock has ignited a fierce debate. The proposal, aimed at addressing budgetary concerns, would see the implementation of emission-based parking charges, similar to those in Bath, with only 30 minutes of free parking available. This move has been met with criticism and warnings from local traders, who fear the negative impact it could have on their businesses and the towns themselves.
The dispute escalated further during a council meeting, where Midsomer Norton North’s Independent representative, Shaun Hughes, criticized the handling of the situation, calling it a “pantomime.” Hughes expressed concerns over the potential 20% increase in pricing by 2025, highlighting the discontent and frustration prevalent among the local community.
The clash extended to the decision to make the new parking charges emission-based. While the initiative was initially introduced in Bath to combat air pollution, it drew criticism in the context of Midsomer Norton, where residents might not have access to the latest fuel-efficient vehicles. The council member for highways, Manda Rigby, defended the emission-based charges, emphasizing the need to protect those who are impacted by environmental pollution.
READ MORE: Vital M5 link road upgrade in Somerset postponed until late-2024
READ MORE: Discover the Festive Market at Clarks Village in Somerset
Traders in Midsomer Norton and Radstock have echoed their anxieties about the proposed changes, with concerns that the introduction of parking charges could negatively affect the vitality of the towns and lead to significant economic repercussions. The potential impact on small businesses, as expressed by a shop owner on Midsomer Norton High Street, further underscores the widespread apprehension regarding the council’s plan.
The discontent and apprehension voiced by representatives and local stakeholders emphasize the significance of public consultation in shaping the final decision. The call for a broader and more inclusive discussion reflects the necessity of considering diverse perspectives and potential consequences before implementing such impactful changes.