Local businesses in Clevedon are taking a stand against the Business Improvement District (BID) levy after a controversial vote last summer. The BID, aimed at funding town improvements through business levies, was approved with the help of North Somerset Council properties, sparking dissatisfaction among the business community.
In response, businesses have initiated a “payment protest,” refusing to pay the BID levy and now facing the prospect of legal action. Despite appealing to the Secretary of State, businesses were unsuccessful in challenging the BID’s continuation for another five years.
The organizers of the protest, including Daniel Adams of Stationary House, expressed frustration at the council’s approach, highlighting the disparity in levy contributions between the council and local businesses. The businesses argue that the council’s 50% BID discount, while expecting full payments from other businesses and charity shops, is unjust.
READ MORE: Celebrating the Success of Peasedown St John Primary School
READ MORE: Latest Death and Funeral Notices in Somerset
The controversy has prompted a call for transparency and dialogue between the council and the protesting businesses, with concerns about the lack of consultation and the threat of legal action adding to the growing discontent.
While the council defended its decision to support the BID, emphasizing its positive impact on the town, local councillor Luke Smith criticized the lack of transparency and consultation in the process. He cautioned against the potential damage that legal action would cause to the local businesses and the community, urging a more constructive approach to address the issue.
The dispute over the BID ballot’s outcome, incorporating both numerical votes and the rateable value of businesses, underscores the deep-seated dissatisfaction within the local business community. Despite the council’s assertion of limited influence over the BID and its encouragement for businesses to engage more actively in local decision-making, the protest reflects a broader call for fair representation and effective communication.