A clash over housing is unfolding in Glastonbury as residents of the Zig Zag building, once a haven for artists and unconventional living, face eviction from what is deemed an “unfit for human” habitation site. This confrontation has raised concerns among local activists who see it as not just a planning dispute but a struggle to preserve the town’s essence.
During a Glastonbury Town Council meeting on April 8, Rohan Black emphasized that the forced displacement of Zig Zag residents exacerbates local homelessness and jeopardizes the town’s longstanding commitment to creativity and inclusivity.
“This goes beyond land use or planning enforcement,” Rohan remarked. “It’s about the people, the character of Glastonbury, and our collective duty to uphold the values that have defined this town as a place of tolerance, innovation, and community.”
READ MORE: Public Meeting to Discuss Proposed 750 Home Development in Bridgwater
READ MORE: Surge in Abandoned ‘Pandemic Puppies’ Overwhelming Somerset Rescue Centre
He highlighted the eviction of individuals residing in vans and caravans, drawing attention to the divide between conventional homeowners and those seeking alternative housing. “Van dwellers and caravanners aren’t a problem to be resolved,” he insisted. “They are integral to Glastonbury’s diverse community fabric.”
The Zig Zag, situated in a former factory on the outskirts of town, has played a vital role as a space for creativity and refuge. It has hosted exhibitions, performances, and discussions, welcoming artists, musicians, and advocates. According to Rohan, it has also functioned as an informal support network for the town’s “non-bricks and mortar” community, particularly as homelessness persists in nearby areas.
Since March 2023, Somerset Council has taken enforcement action against the site, asserting its unsuitability for human habitation, a view supported by the Planning Inspectorate. In July, the site’s proprietor, Chris Black, lost an appeal and was mandated to remove all caravans and rehabilitate the land.
Chris expressed inability to comply with the order, citing its impracticality and unreasonableness. He admitted to enabling individuals to reside on the grounds as part of a broader effort to develop a cultural quarter in a neglected part of Glastonbury, and refuted claims of contributing to anti-social behavior and crime. He lamented the drain on project resources and the substantial costs incurred in legal battles against the council’s enforcement actions.
Following a public inquiry, planning inspector Siobhan Watson detailed evidence of the site’s involvement in anti-social behavior and crime, deeming living conditions as inadequate and emphasizing its negative visual impact. Chris contested these findings and indicated efforts to improve the site, including the removal of a container, while expressing willingness to engage with Somerset Council.
In February, Somerset Council acknowledged the broader challenges faced by van dwellers and expressed commitment to identifying locations for both temporary and permanent pitches. However, the Zig Zag residents have been instructed to comply with the eviction order for the time being.
Rohan urged the council to take compassionate and innovative measures, proposing temporary accommodation or secure parking zones for van dwellers, the establishment of a working group with the non-bricks and mortar community, and the recognition of grassroots initiatives contributing to the town’s ethos.
“We are in the process of submitting a new planning application for the Zig Zag as an arts and cultural center,” he added, “a venue that fosters creativity and provides social welfare and community support – aligning with the spirit of Glastonbury.”